Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
03/08/2018 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SCR10 | |
| HB71 | |
| HB400 | |
| HJR38 | |
| HB310 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SCR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 400 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 184 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HJR 38 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 310 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 400-FEES FOR FIRE PREVENTION MEASURES
3:44:35 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 400, "An Act relating to the collection
of fees by the Department of Public Safety for fire and
explosion prevention and safety services."
[Because of their length, some amendments discussed or adopted
during the meeting are found at the end of the minutes of HB
400. Shorter amendments are included in the main text.]
3:45:42 PM
CATHY SCHLINGHEYDE, Staff, Representative Jonathan Kreiss-
Tomkins, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf the House State
Affairs Standing Committee, prime sponsor of HB 400, presented
Amendment 1, labeled 30-LS1490\A.1, Bannister, 3/7/18, which
read: [The text of Amendment 1 is listed at the end of the
3/8/18 minutes of HB 400.]
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE relayed that Amendment 1 would establish fines
for the violation of fire safety measures; currently they are
listed as misdemeanors; the Department of Public Safety (DPS)
would like to move these violations out of the misdemeanor
category and assign them statutorily defined fines. She stated
that Section 2 of Amendment 1, [page 1, lines 8-14] would
establish the fines.
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE offered that Section 3, [page 1, lines 16, to
page 3, line 25], would allow DPS to issue the citations for the
fines and would establish a timeline and procedure for the
administration. She added that subsection (p) of Section 3,
[page 3, lines 16-19], would remove the offense from the
misdemeanor section to ensure there is not a double penalty for
the same offense.
3:46:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked whether the fines relate to fire
protection and safety.
MS. SCHLINGHEYDE answered yes.
3:47:30 PM
DAVID TYLER, Director State Fire Marshall, Division of Fire and
Life Safety (DFLS), Department of Public Safety (DPS), stated
that currently the only recourse for DFLS to address a violation
is to issue a warning or charge the offender with a Class B
misdemeanor. The fines offer a more immediate tool to provide
incentive for compliance without "taking the misdemeanor route."
3:48:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL mentioned that a penalty for a violation on
a construction site can be a misdemeanor charge; it is rarely
charged because it constitutes such a heavy penalty; legislation
was introduced to change the penalty to a fine so that offenders
will be cited more frequently. He suggested the proposed
legislation posed a similar scenario. He asked whether someone
could be served with a $5,000 fine, if an inspection revealed
ten violations with a $500 fine for each.
MR. TYLER replied that the $500 would be the maximum that could
be charged for a violation. He stated that DFLS is conducting
research to establish an appropriate fine for different
offenses. He maintained that offenses are of varying levels of
seriousness; DFLS does not want the fines to be too onerous on
businesses; DFLS wants businesses to be able to make the
repairs; and it wants to incentivize them to do the repair
before the inspection.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL offered the following scenario: as a
business owner he pays for and receives an inspection;
violations are noted. He asked whether fines would be assessed
at the time of the inspection or if there would be a period
allowing for a remedy to be applied and a second inspection,
before fines are assessed. He summarized by asking, "Do you
have to pay for someone to come out and give you fines?"
MR. TYLER responded that the two issues are separate. The fee
for the inspection is billed separately and DFLS deputies would
not be doing that. He said that for the egregious violations,
DFLS deputies will write citations; the goal is compliance. He
offered that if upon inspection, a building has 30 violations,
it is not the intent of DFLS to drive the owner out of business.
It would focus on the immediate life and safety issues and work
backwards to the ones that are less serious. He maintained that
it is the goal of DFLS to work with people, not put them out of
business.
3:52:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL mentioned that he has a building that is
inspected. He suggested that the inspectors give him a
summation of what needs to be remedied; they give him time to
comply; he notifies them that he has complied; and the
inspectors check for those remedies during their next
inspection. He maintained that this scenario is a great way to
get people to comply. He offered that his concern is that
people not get penalized for participating in an inspection
process and that this isn't just a way for the state to make up
for funding shortages. He agreed that compliance is the goal.
He asked whether there is a problem getting people to comply
with the fire and safety requirements.
MR. TYLER responded, "That's absolutely correct." He said that
in many instances DFLS deputies are called "paper tigers"; they
have no real "bite," unless they charge offenders with
misdemeanors. He said that under HB 71, DFLS plans to send a
letter to the business two months in advance of the inspection
and list the violations that it typically finds. This would
give the business owner time to fix the problems before the
inspection and a time schedule for inspection. He mentioned
that DFLS would focus on the more serious violations, such as
fire extinguishers not in place, sprinklers and alarm systems
not compliant, egress blockage, and emergency lighting.
3:55:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked whether a first inspection is
accompanied by fines or if someone would be given a chance to
fix a problem before he/she gets a fine.
MR. TYLER answered that a pre-inspection form will be sent out;
it is the goal of DFLS to work with people and not just visit
the premises and fine the owners. If there is an egregious
violation, DFLS will resort to [fines] immediately, but
collecting fines is not the goal of DFLS. He added that re-
visiting a place may be difficult because of the cost of travel.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS asked for the number of Class B
misdemeanors levied per year for failure to comply under the
current law.
MR. TYLER answered that information back to 2007, with three
years missing, indicates there have been none.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS referred to page 1, lines 13-14, of
Amendment 1, which states that each day that the violation or
noncompliance continues, is a separate offense. He asked
whether that means that for each day that there is
noncompliance, the building owner is subject to another $500
fine; therefore, the fines would add up accumulatively.
MR. TYLER conceded that it was a stiff penalty; he suggested
that DFLS would not consider it another violation unless a
future inspection determined that nothing had been remedied.
3:58:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked why no distinction is made in the
amendment or in the statute between someone just notified of a
violation and someone who fails to comply to an order to fix a
problem. She opined that the latter person would be more
culpable that the former.
MR. TYLER answered that he understands her reasoning but doesn't
know how to draft the language for a "compounding" fine.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX suggested that Legislative Legal and
Research Services could help draft such language. She asked Mr.
Tyler for his reaction to the concept.
MR. TYLER replied, "I have no problem with that at all." He
said there are many instances in which people are aware that
there are no consequences of a DFLS visit. He maintained that a
harsher fine for someone who ignores DFLS and is not taking
safety seriously would send a better message.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that Amendment 1 would be held
over for more work with the assistance of Legislative Legal and
Research Services.
4:01:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX suggested the possibility of a serious
injury or death. She referred to proposed legislation [HB 259]
heard in the House Judiciary Standing Committee meeting of
3/5/18, in which load vehicle load limits were discussed; people
had been seriously hurt or maimed; and under Alaska statute,
surpassing load limits only constituted a violation. She
offered that if a violation resulted in injury or death, the
penalty should be substantial. She requested that the amendment
be rewritten to address a violation which results in a fire in
which someone is hurt or killed, or property is damaged.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS concurred and added that [HB 259] addressed
unsecured loads, not load limits.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON stated that fire and safety inspections
should be available to people with commercial properties who
want to be law abiding citizens. She expressed that fire and
life safety is an essential public service and the reason for
having "government." She mentioned discussion of proposed
legislation [HB 322, House Resources Standing Committee meeting
hearing on 2/9/18] about waiving the cost of receiving advice
from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) on the
management of spills; those with commercial buildings who seek
advice to ensure safety compliance may be discouraged by being
charged fees for an assessment. She stated that she has never
thought of a fire marshal as being a paper tiger; he/she shows
up with a badge and carries all the weight and enforcement of a
law officer. She concluded by saying that endangering lives may
be worth more than $500 per day or warrant legal action. She
urged reevaluation of Amendment 1.
4:05:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL stated that he never considered the fire
marshal to be a paper tiger; when the marshal instructs him to
do something, he does it. He added that some owners have large
buildings; they don't know what the fire marshal will check or
how extensive the inspection will be. He maintained that he is
amenable to having the inspection, and under HB 400, may be
paying for the inspection. He stated that he would like to be
given a list of violations, a chance to fix the problems, and
possibly pay for a follow up inspection. He maintained that
$500 per day per violation could become very expensive. He
suggested that if DFLS is hesitant to issue misdemeanors,
perhaps it should shut the business down.
4:06:53 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced HB 400 would be held over.
AMENDMENT(S)
The following amendment to HB 400 was either discussed or
adopted during the hearing. [Shorter amendments are provided in
the main text only.]
AMENDMENT 1 [30-LS1490\A.1, Bannister, 3/7/18]:
Page 1, line 2, following "services;":
Insert "and relating to penalties for violating
fire protection and safety requirements and orders"
Page 1, following line 9:
Insert new bill sections to read:
"* Sec. 2. AS 18.70.100(a) is amended to read:
(a) A [EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN (c) OF THIS
SECTION, A] person who violates a provision of
AS 18.70.010 - 18.70.100 or a regulation adopted under
those sections, or who fails to comply with an order
issued under AS 18.70.010 - 18.70.100, is guilty of a
violation and shall be punished as provided in
AS 12.55 by a fine of not more than $500. Each day
[CLASS B MISDEMEANOR. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED,
EACH 10 DAYS] that the violation or noncompliance
continues is a separate offense.
* Sec. 3. AS 18.70.100 is amended by adding new
subsections to read:
(d) A peace officer or an employee of the
department who is authorized by the commissioner of
public safety to enforce this chapter may issue a
citation to a person who commits a violation
identified under this section.
(e) A citation issued under this section must
comply with the standards adopted under AS 12.25.175 -
12.25.230. A person receiving the citation is not
required to sign a promise to appear in court.
(f) The time specified in the notice to appear
on a citation issued under this section must be at
least five working days after the issuance of the
citation.
(g) The commissioner of public safety is
responsible for the issuance of books containing
appropriate citations and shall maintain a record of
each book and each citation contained in the book. The
commissioner of public safety shall require and retain
a receipt for each book issued to an employee of the
department designated by the commissioner of public
safety to provide investigative services to enforce
provisions of this chapter.
(h) On or before the 10th working day after
issuance of a citation, a peace officer or an employee
issuing a citation under this section shall deposit
the original or a copy of the citation with a court
having jurisdiction over the alleged offense. Upon the
deposit of the citation with the court, the citation
may be disposed of only by trial in the court or other
official action taken by the magistrate, judge, or
prosecutor. The peace officer or employee who issued
the citation may not dispose of the original or copies
of the citation or of the record of the issuance of
the citation except as required under this subsection
and (i) of this section.
(i) The commissioner of public safety shall
require the return of a copy of each citation issued
under this section and of the copies of each citation
that has been spoiled or on which an entry has been
made and not issued to an alleged violator. The
commissioner of public safety shall also maintain in
connection with each citation issued a record of the
disposition of the charge by the court in which the
original or copy of the citation was deposited.
(j) A citation issued under this section is
considered to be a lawful complaint for the purpose of
prosecution.
(k) Unless the citation has been voided or
otherwise dismissed by the magistrate, judge, or
prosecutor, or bail has been forfeited under this
section, a person who fails to appear in court to
answer a citation issued under this section,
regardless of the disposition of the charge for which
the citation was issued, is guilty of failure to obey
a citation under AS 12.25.230(b).
(l) The supreme court shall establish a schedule
of bail amounts. The maximum bail forfeiture amount
for a violation may not exceed the maximum fine
specified under (a) of this section for that
violation. The issuing peace officer or employee shall
write on the citation the amount of bail forfeiture
applicable to the violation.
(m) If a person cited for a violation for which
a bail forfeiture amount has been established under
(l) of this section does not contest the citation, the
person may, within 30 days after the date of the
citation, mail or personally deliver to the clerk of
the court in which the citation is filed by the peace
officer or employee
(1) the amount of bail indicated on the
citation for that offense; and
(2) a copy of the citation indicating that
the right to an appearance is waived, a plea of no
contest is entered, and the bail is forfeited.
(n) When the cited person has forfeited bail
under (m) of this section, the court shall enter a
judgment of conviction. Forfeiture of bail is a
complete satisfaction for the violation. The clerk of
the court accepting the bail forfeiture shall provide
the offender with a receipt stating that fact if
requested.
(o) A person cited under this section is guilty
of failure to obey a citation under AS 12.25.230(b) if
the person fails to pay the bail amount established
under (l) of this section or fails to appear in court
as required.
(p) Notwithstanding other provisions of law, if
a person cited for a violation for which a bail
forfeiture amount has been established under (l) of
this section appears in court and is found guilty, the
court may not impose a penalty that exceeds the
forfeiture amount for that violation established under
(l) of this section.
(q) In this section, "department" means the
Department of Public Safety."
Renumber the following bill section accordingly.
Page 1, following line 13:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 5. AS 18.70.100(c) is repealed."
[End of Amendment 1 - HB 400 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SCR 10 Sponsor Statement 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Ver U 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Summary of Changes ver D-U 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Fiscal Note LAA 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Supporting Document - Letters of Support 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| HB 71 Sectional Analysis 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| HB71 ver O 3.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| HB 71 Explanation of Changes 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| HB400 Sponsor Statement 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 Sectional Analysis 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 ver A 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 Fiscal Note DPS 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 Amendment 1 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HJR38 Sponsor Statement 2.26.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR038 ver A 2.22.18.PDF |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Fiscal Note LEG 2.26.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Index of Support Documents 2.26.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Letters of Support 2.26.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Index of Reference Documents 2.26.2018b.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Additional Documents- Reference 2.26.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Powerpoint Presentation 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Dick Welsh 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Ocean View Community Council 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Beth Fread 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter Anchorage Board of Realtors 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Ocean View Community Council 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Document Written Testimony from Bob Gastrock 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Alaska Association of Realtors 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Dimond Shopping Center 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Public Letters of Support 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Document Written Testimony from John Pletcher 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document Testifier Resume 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Documnet- Letter Robert Gastrock 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Pictures from John Pletcher 3.1.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR 38 Supporting Letter from Bonne' Woldstad 3.1.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from James Armstrong 3.1.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR 38 Supporting Document- Jack Brown Wirtten Testimony 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR 38 Supporting Letter from Roy Longacre 3.5.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Opposing Document- Alaska Railroad Letter of Opposition 2.27.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Opposition Letter- Teamseters Local 959 3.9.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HB310 Sponsor Statement 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 ver A 2.6.18.PDF |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Fiscal Note DHSS 2.16.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Child Marriage in America Executive Summary 2.19.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Child Marriage in America 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Minors Married in Alaska 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Tahirih Child Marriage Backgrounder 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document- Letter from Office of Victim's Rights 2.20.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document- Letters of Support 2.22.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-ACT Support Letter 2.27.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |